On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:07:12PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Relying on an installed git does impose an additional deployment > requirement we didn't have before. Previously git was just required > for running the tests (developers), but not for deployment.
I'd be surprised if most people don't already have Git on their system, given that they certainly have Git repositories! Although I suppose it's possible to have CGit running in a container that can see the repositories but doesn't have git available. > I'll wait to receive some other opinions on the topic of relying on > having the executables around. > > Alternatively - any chance of working with upstream to make it a more > generic interface? There's enough code to work through and understand (including quite a lot that isn't used in our scenario) that it's outside the scope of my CGit budget at the moment. _______________________________________________ CGit mailing list CGit@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit