I'm wholly responsible for my own messes :) and I'm actually very pleased to be putting myself through this type of routine before any work colleague is bugged.
Moreover it's a fine test of the robustness of Chandler Desktop backup/restore routines. In this case Things 1.0.1 is a factor. Maybe Apple iCal and Sync Engine are factors, too. I shouldn't point the finger, simply beware. There are probably many other software titles that will deserve interop testing in due course. Adam Procter wrote: > > I think I stated in my feedback was I felt in things it was to easy to > delete stuff (put in trash) this should be the last option - like in > Chandler > My own feedback, planned but not submitted, is that removal is not an acceptable default when sync is enabled. Daily removal may be an acceptable default for as long as Things is in island mode, but FWIW they should alert the user to the consequences as soon as the user aims to sync. Best Graham -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Things-released-tp2183632p2186982.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
