Jos Yule wrote: > > Re: ID's and the like. There has been requests to allow one to "link" one > note to another note. Some suggestions have been to have some kind of > human readable Hash (note id: 1X3B), which you could then use like a URL > to link to a note with that id ( http://1X3B). >
note-specific URLs and/or tickets <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12670> Would a human-readable hash be dependent upon, or parallel to, enhancement bug 12670? > This could be extended to Collections too, where each collection would > have an ID, which you could then use as you write about below. > A hash of the 36-character UID? I like the idea of human readable, but I wonder whether at some point the 'bearer' of a hash will communicate it to other users, not realising that the hash may be _not_ unique. Issue 12670 is one for which I would cast a vote — reference to a specific point (a note) within a collection is highly desirable — but there's no voting for Cosmo. Regards Graham -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Easy--And-interesting-feature-to-add--tp2290506p2298625.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
