Owen-2 wrote: > > … Every note appears to have a (creation or last modified) date associated > with it. > > Logically (imho) unscheduled notes should not display a date, >
First thought: I agree. Second thought: what about the date of an alarm? Third thought: we have the (small) alarm icon. I remain undecided on this… > and should drop to the bottom of the list. > -1 to sinking without a clean up. Whilst it's logical for bubbles (typically blue dots) to float items upwards, I don't like the idea of sinkage. Wherever possible, avoid making things more complicated than simple triage + clean up. > That way they can be recognised and analysed. > If a thing lacks something (e.g. a schedule), better to simply leave it visibly lacking. > If it is absolutely essential that Chandler shows a date for each note > then "Unscheduled" should appear as a section between Later and Done. > I'd prefer white space to Unscheduled. > I am not saying that "Unscheduled" should be part of the triage, > Agreed; triage should be kept uncomplicated. > just that notes that have not been scheduled should clearly appear, > visibly, not to have been scheduled. At the moment that isn't the case. > Agreed … and I'll consider the other messages in this topic ASAP. Time to head to work now. This discussion is very interesting to me. When I first edited <http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/DashboardIcons>, for Chandler 1.0.2, the Summary table: date aspect was the one aspect that really bothered me. I too often find myself choosing to ignore that column. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Unscheduled-%27to-do%27-lists.-tp2860329p2888895.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
