> I gather that was the point of the Chandler re-arch project aka > Chandler 2 - they realised that the structure of Chandler was not easy > to work on and was encumbered with the provisions for ambitious > features that were never realised.
"Plan to throw one away." [ominous music][reverb] When open source projects go wrong... [/reverb][/ominous music] LOL > Unfortunately Chandler 2 seems to have dragged to a standstill > at a point where it is not quite a working system that others > can start adding to. I'm sticking with version 1 for the moment. I've got enough ideas to work with already without adding a refactor in... _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
