Sorry for the rants. These days I'm studying old APL docs and try to code
in J, when doing that I am amazed at how different they are (not to mention
that many old J code in 2000 can't run in current J, so it's great to see
LJ has updates), and yes, it's an addiction to play with J/APL. But I'm
disgusting of those advertisements and empty assertions without relevant
and concrete examples. In fact, J is very flexible, because you may look at
it as a wrapper of C, and vice versa. If expressible in C, then
concurrency/parallelism (that is not equivalent to threading) is a free
lunch nowadays. But for SQL-like query interface, k/q is the only
accessible one. Does kona support it?


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Of course.
>
> I don't think anyone would say that the existence of languages like APL (or
> any of its derivatives) means that all of the rest of achievement in the
> context of computers will go away, or should go away.
>
> Ok, maybe some would say such things, but I see no reason to express
> agreement with them.
>
> Lessons to learn from though?
>
> That, I think is the point.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:30 AM, CL Jason <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > No, not-supporting-something is not a shame, nor a glory excuse.
> > Concurrency/parallel and dbms have their own merits and are also
> > interesting.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > 0. I'd be interested in some additional perspective on why you believe
> > the
> > > contents are irrelevant. (thanks!)
> > >
> > > 1. kona, also - but since his general gist was about architectural
> > issues,
> > > rather than focussing on a particular implementation, I am inclined to
> > > forgive him for the slightly confused presentation.
> > >
> > > 2. J is indeed single threaded, but you can run multiple J processes.
> > And,
> > > in fact, jhs gives you a server implementation which (with a relatively
> > > small amount of work - trivial compared to the amount of work people
> put
> > > into serious programming efforts) can give you multiple J processes
> under
> > > the control of a single client.
> > >
> > > 3. Here, I think you are drawing a contrast between high volume
> > transaction
> > > processing (such as Amazon might need for its shopping cart
> > implementation)
> > > and analytics work (where someone tries to correlate information).  I
> am
> > > not sure that I'd use a K/Q rdbms implementation at Amazon - I expect
> the
> > > hardware costs would be too high. Then again, I'm not working for
> Amazon
> > so
> > > I'm not sure that I'll care a lot about this issue. [More generally: a
> > tool
> > > being useful never means that other tools are not useful for other
> > things.]
> > >
> > > And, as an aside, perl can be fun... (but I've not read that /. page,
> > yet)
> > >
> > > Anyways... I feel that the point you are trying to drive at is that no
> > one
> > > has been writing much about using J in multiprocess contexts, yet?
> > >
> > > If so, I'll just remind you that that's more a cultural observation -
> > about
> > > what we have felt like doing and talking about - than anything else.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Raul
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:22 AM, CL Jason <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 0. Yes, the pictures are taken of many APL/J masters, but the
> contents
> > > are
> > > > much irrelavent.
> > > > 1. arguments based on k/q: please check all the concrete examples
> > against
> > > > nosql apps, if those paragraphs of k/q were removed, there are only
> > empty
> > > > assertions
> > > > 2. up to now, J is single-threaded, k/q has some supports of
> > > > multi-threading, which is one form of concurrency/parallel
> programming
> > > > 3. DBMS is more than just a query interface, and supporting the
> subset
> > of
> > > > SQL doesn't mean the other parts of SQL are shit.
> > > >
> > > > there is even /. advertisement:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://developers.slashdot.org/story/13/07/30/2348212/remember-the-computer-science-past-or-be-condemned-to-repeat-it
> > > > where
> > > > you'll even see ads for Perl...
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to