Yes, Chat!
There's a "scrambled" version!!! (might as well not bother then?) :-
he says
'The "scrambled" options for these books is just a way to give you
version(s) that have normal-looking hands for small values.'
Otherwise, low numbers result in highly non-random (looking) plays,
which is why my 1234
was ill-advised, yielding 13 spades for North and so on.
Time to stop?
Mike
On 15/10/2018 17:26, Brian Schott wrote:
[Moved to chat]
I produced single random value with the following code.
]j=.".'x',~'53,644,737,765,488,792,839,237,440,000'-.','
53644737765488792839237440000
?.j
43666114835851906990879566194
When I then entered the following pair of numbers into the page field on
the linked page I got the following resulting two "hands".
43666114835851906990879566194 43666114835851906990879566195
Actually, I will not produce that 2 hands, but simply mention that they
look identical except that the 2 west hands have spades 62 vs 42. Btw, when
I entered the hand ending in 3, the only distinction was that west spades
are KJ.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:28 AM 'Mike Day' via Programming <
[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, that's a nice example of J, although that example leaves each hand
in its shuffle order. The Rosetta task doesn't require reordering
within hands.
No advance on the J front hereafter, just a link to a Bridge fan's view.
This site claims (I think) to display any possible Bridge deal (!):
https://bridge.thomasoandrews.com/impossible/
The title is "The Impossible Bridge Book", his/their point being that they
can efficiently index or access any of the huge number of all deals
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
