…the biggest rivals to ever challenge QWERTY is the Dvorak Simplified Keyboard 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard>,
Read more: 
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/fact-of-fiction-the-legend-of-the-qwerty-keyboard-49863249/#8lwWLGJ1whxVXPO5.99
 
<https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/fact-of-fiction-the-legend-of-the-qwerty-keyboard-49863249/#8lwWLGJ1whxVXPO5.99>

> When a design depends on a previous innovation too entrenched in the cultural 
> zeitgeist to change, it’s known as a path dependency 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_dependence>. And this why the new KALQ 
> proposal is so interesting. It attempts to break from the tyranny of 
> Christopher Latham Sholes, whose QWERTY system makes even less sense on the 
> virtual keyboards of tablets and smartphones than it does on a computer 
> keyboards. Is the new KALQ system any different? In some ways, the answer is 
> obviously yes. It has been designed around a very specific, very modern 
> behavior – typing with thumbs.

Donna Y
[email protected]


> On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:30 PM, 'Jim Russell' via Chat <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks! To test the whole QWERTY story, I converted to (?forgot the name of 
> the other one?) for a while and never noticed  an appreciable difference. I 
> remain confused. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to