The "Array Thinking" page is at
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Array_Thinking but it still needs some work
on formatting.

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:12 PM Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes - on the "Array Thinking" page I referred to a similar note you sent a
> while back and I quote from the Perlis paper.  The explicit reference to
> the APL expression on the Ken Iverson page (at
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_E._Iverson#/media/File:APLparen.png)
> is nice, especially in its similarity to the J version I'm using.
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:49 AM Roger Hui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Your one-liner on parentheses nesting has an ancient and honorable
>> pedigree.  See the Ken Iverson Wikipedia page
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_E._Iverson> (in the IBM
>> (1960-1980)
>> section) and the third paragraph of Alan Perlis's "*APL is more French
>> than
>> English*" <https://www.jsoftware.com/papers/perlis78.htm>.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:38 AM Devon McCormick <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > There's this (adapted from my new "Array Thinking" page on the J wiki):
>> >    NB. String from https://wiki.c2.com/?LispShowOffExamples
>> >    string=. '(flet ((inside-p (obj) (lambda (d) (inside-p obj (ray-point
>> > ray d)))))'
>> >    string,:' '-.~":'()' ([:+/\1 _1 0{~i.) string    NB. Example result
>> > (flet ((inside-p (obj) (lambda (d) (inside-p obj (ray-point ray d)))))
>> > 1111112333333333344443344444444554455555555555555666666666666666654321
>> >    NB. Final "1" indicates we are missing a closing paren
>> > The one-liner is " '()' ([:+/\1 _1 0{~i.) string"; the bit preceding
>> this
>> > simply squishes the parentheses' counts to single, text digits so they
>> > align character-by-character with the string (won't work if the string
>> > presents more than 9 levels of nesting).
>> > Also, that "LISP Show-off" page referenced might be a good source of
>> > succinct algos amenable to translation into J.
>> >
>> > Another one I resurrected recently is something I wrote a long time ago
>> in
>> > APL called "interval sum".  Given two two-column tables - "iv0" and
>> "iv1" -
>> > of start, stop points defining intervals, this expression returns the
>> > (#iv0) x #iv1 table of intersections between each interval.  This is
>> > positive for intervals that overlap, negative for disjunct intervals
>> > (measuring the gap between them), and zero for intervals that share only
>> > one endpoint.  So, for example:
>> >
>> >    (iv0=. 0 5,_1 4,2 3,6 3,5 8,:6 8);iv1=. _1 0,1 3,0 5,_1 8,:9 10
>> > +----+-----+
>> > | 0 5|_1  0|
>> > |_1 4| 1  3|
>> > | 2 3| 0  5|
>> > | 6 3|_1  8|
>> > | 5 8| 9 10|
>> > | 6 8|     |
>> > +----+-----+
>> >
>> >    iv0 (([:|: [:/:~"1 [) (([:|:[ 0}~ [:- 0{[) +/ . <./ ]0}~ [:- 0{])
>> [:|:
>> > [:/:~"1 ]) iv1
>> >  0  2  5 5 _4
>> >  1  2  4 5 _5
>> > _2  1  1 1 _6
>> > _3  0  2 3 _3
>> > _5 _2  0 3 _1
>> > _6 _3 _1 2 _1
>> >
>> > The following attempts to illustrate how the inner product " +/ . <./ "
>> > works.  The trick is that we negate the 0th column of each set of
>> intervals
>> > (after sorting so that the starting point of the interval is less than
>> or
>> > equal to the ending point) so that the <./ gives us the negative of the
>> > larger of the two starting points.  I have a marvelous proof of why this
>> > works but the margin is too small to contain it*.
>> >
>> > In any case, we see here the two sets of intervals as shown above but
>> with
>> > their initial columns negated and the result of the inner product
>> > positioned in a way to try to make clear what is happening:
>> > +----+-----------------+
>> > ||:iv1| 1 _1  0  1  _9 |
>> > |iv0  | 0  3  5  8  10 |
>> > +-----+----------------+
>> > | 0 5 | 0  2  5  5  _4 | (0<.1)+(5<.0)=0; (0<._1)+(5<.3)=2;
>> > (0<.0)+(5<.5)=5...
>> > | 1 4 | 1  2  4  5  _5 | (1<.1)+(4<.0)=1; (1<._1)+(4<.3)=2;
>> > (1<.0)+(4<.5)=4...
>> > |_2 3 |_2  1  1  1  _6 |
>> > |_6 3 |_3  0  2  3  _3 |
>> > |_5 8 |_5 _2  0  3  _1 |
>> > |_6 8 |_6 _3 _1  2  _1 |
>> > +-----+----------------+
>> >
>> > *Come to NYCJUG on Tuesday, April 14th to see the proof.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Devon McCormick, CFA
>
> Quantitative Consultant
>
>

-- 

Devon McCormick, CFA

Quantitative Consultant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to