> Ken Iverson ranks right up there. Not convinced? See https://forums.dyalog.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1742 for just one example. The point remains the same whether you denote power by * (APL) or ^ (J).
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 9:57 AM Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote: > Ellenberg is not yet dead!? :-) > > Mathematicians deal with ideas, so I consider the legacy of ideas is more > significant. Ken Iverson ranks right up there. > > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 8:10 AM Brian Schott <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> John, >> >> I found your related post at >> >> https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/p4jhzm/most_impressive_mathematician_grave/ >> . >> Because I have been reading 2 books by Jordan Ellenberg I did a search >> from >> there on "Ellenberg". I have been impressed by Ellenberg's writing and >> have >> considered producing a jchat on the subject. Having found another link via >> reddit which yields a short article by Ellenberg, I have elected to >> respond >> to your message with the purpose of sharing the following link which I >> believe serves 2 purposes: it is a good example of Ellenberg's material in >> a very brief format, and it is an inspiring piece. So consider the link >> below my attempt to come out about Ellenberg. >> https://hmmdaily.com/2018/09/28/john-urschel-goes-pro/ >> >> >> -- >> (B=) >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
