0.4 is incompatible with 0.3. Even if there weren't good design decisions
for doing so (which there are), I still think 0.4 should be incompatible
with 0.3 just for the sake of starting with a fresh network.
0.3 sucks. Let it die.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Goerzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Please archive 0.3 content
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> As an addendum, if 0.4 can speak to an 0.3 node, could people just
> keep up the 0.3 nodes for queries until they get cached by 0.4?
>
>
> > "David McNab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> With freenet 0.3 soon to cease, and freenet 0.4 coming in like a
Concorde,
> >> we urgently need to archive as much of the 0.3 freenet content as
possible,
> >> especially all those loose CHKs and KSKs.
> >
> > Why is it that this needs to be done? Why cannot Freenet 0.4 remain
> > compatible with existing content?
> >
> > -- John
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chat mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
>
> --
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.complete.org
> #include <std_disclaimer.h> GnuPG key 0x8A1D9A1F from
www.complete.org/key
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
>
>
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
