This is even more fun (and even more scary): http://zgp.org/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2005-January/002304.html
I'd be surprised if they don't have a UK equivalent. Given that it costs a million pounds (~ $1.8M) to get it repudiated even if you HAVE prior art, how many of the p2p companies are going to challenge it rather than pay the 1% or whatever it is of turnover? BTW, did anyone check the RFCs? I think the URN RFC mentions an MD5 scheme. On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:54:14AM +0000, Toad wrote: > Just thought I'd send some light entertainment to freenet-chat to > distract from the heavy lifting going on on tech. > > http://kwiki.ffii.org/UkHorrorGalleryEn > > We probably violate GB2329310, GB2350213 and GB2328297. All 3 are from > IBM but probably aren't part of the lucky 500. I doubt they'd come after > _us_ though. :) > > Emacs probably violates GB2312973 > > Mozilla probably violates GB2340001 (depending on the scope of claim c), > and GB2364408 (along with most other browsers), GB2348576, and possibly > GB2356780. > > A lot of UK universities probably violate GB2321120. > -- > Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > _______________________________________________ > chat mailing list > chat@freenetproject.org > Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
