On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 01:41:37PM +0200, Rainer Kupke wrote: > Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:52:00AM +0200, Rainer Kupke wrote: > > > Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > [voting against nodes that insert objectionable content] > > > > > > After a night of sleep I came up with two strategies to defeat your > > > idea: > > > > > > First strategy: > > > 1. run several small nodes and never use them to insert stuff. These > > > nodes are "good citizerns". > > > > This is perfectly valid. You can run a node. > > > > > > 2. Create a new node N > > > > > > 3. Use N to insert content > > > > > > 4. Delete N before reprimands hit. > > > > This is quite possible, however I don't see how you are going to be able > > to repeat it, due to the nature of a darknet. Also it might hurt the > > people you connected through. > > I assume that the inserting node gets more blame than the surrounding > nodes and that blame does not stick around forever. Maybe for a very > long time, but definitely not forever. > > So I can surround my "inserter" with one (as above) or more layers of > nodes which act as "blame absorbers". > > When I insert evil stuff my "inserter" will be blamed for it. The nodes > next to it will get some fraction of the blame, but definitely less. > the nodes on the outer layer will get nearly no blame.
They will get no blame, unless they oppose the complaint. > > Before the nodes on my outer layer get blamed for talking to evil nodes > I shutdown the core of my little "evilnet" and replace it with new > nodes. If complaints are repeatedly held up against new nodes connected to a specific small number of nodes, it should be possible for the community to notice this and take action against _them_. The network topology has to be open for premix routing to work, and the node which was punished is revealed when a complaint is upheld. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
