On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:01:20PM +0200, privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:58:13 -0500, you wrote: > > > > Dont implement this. I dont like CP, but once you start down the > > slippery slope, there's no going back. > > > > my $.02 > > Exactly my point! > > As a matter of fact, How about implementing something very much > the reverse? > > Make censorship of ANY kind as close to impossible as can be > managed.
That has always been the intention. You will have read my mail explaining that what I suggested is impossible without an unacceptable security risk from keeping extra records? > The same goes for ANY kind of ability to trace back to the > insertion point or identify an author (excepting of course any > clues or slipups on the author / inserter's part, that's their > responsibility) > > and then make sure that freenet will work if the connections to > and from it are piped through an anonymizing proxy such as TOR. That is considerably more difficult. Sure you can find a public node and use that via Tor (which by the way is centralized and therefore vulnerable), but that's about the limit. You could hide an entire node behind a fake address provided by Tor or I2P, but this would make it extremely slow (and therefore not used by other nodes much, on any routing algorithm that takes performance into account). -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
