Here is the reply from Slyck. I've checked at http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8026, the line is:
"Winny, which features Freenet code and includes anonymous file-sharing, became known in the west when the Big Four record labels' first Japanese victims were found to have been using it." I think that Freenet "concept" instead of "code" would be more correct. Do you want me to mail p2pnet.net too? Regards, Caco_Patane <!> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: May 3, 2006 1:49 PM Subject: RE: Article Errata about Freenet To: Caco Patane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Caco, I will talk to the Slyck editor (Tom Mennecke) about the correction. He can be contacted at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here is where I found my information: http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8026 I checked it against Wikipedia, which says that the two share the same principles. I kept the same line, meaning code in a much looser sense. In saying that, I will do my best to clarify - and I apologise for the confusion caused. Michael Ingram Slyck News www.slyck.com E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AOL: MichaelIntent MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 229086679 Yahoo: MikeIntent _______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
