On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:56 AM, pineapple <pineapplecow...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Has anyone tried running freenet off an SD card or thumb drive?  Is the speed
> sufficient for freenet?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chat mailing list
> chat@freenetproject.org
> Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
> Or mailto:chat-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>

Emailing this again because I forgot to CC the mailinglist....

Freenet's usage pattern does not lend itself to flash SSDs or SD cards
due to the large number of small, random access writes.
Freenet is extremely hard on disks, many a regular hard drive has
succumbed to it.

It *will* wear any flash device out much quicker than normally a user would.

That being said, a very conservative node, configured to use only a
few max peers and a small datastore, logging turned completely off,
only used for small downloads, browsing and inserting a few small
files (for example a thumb drive you could take with you somewhere,
post a blog or upload some important document and go back offline
shortly thereafter) "might" be feasible.  You would want to use one
with fast specifications and don't expect too much...

If you try this, let us know how it works out.



-- 
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
chat@freenetproject.org
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:chat-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to