I'm fine with something more reusable but I need concrete ideas. The only issue I can think of is the non-locality of such a declaration.
Thanks ZK On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Ara Pulido <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On 23/03/14 23:02, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > > Hey > > > > I've filed a bug [1] on being unable to use a resource job from another > > provider namespace, and started the discussion on possible ways to > > address it. I would welcome your feedback on my proposal. > > I like it, but if you need to use the package resource (i.e.) in many > jobs in the same job file, would it make sense to think of ways to > import once, use many times? > > (If this would make things a lot more difficult, I am happy with your > approach. I prefer to do simple things). > > Thanks, > Ara. > > > > > Thanks > > ZK > > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/1296424 > > > > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
