On 12/03/15 15:00, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > This merge requests [1] makes me realize we should have support for > interactive resource jobs. It's much less of a hack than using > dependencies and failing remaining jobs. > > > [1] > https://code.launchpad.net/~cypressyew/checkbox/fix-desc-touchscreen-job/+merge/252683
This is the incorrect fix for this, but I didn't arrive soon enough to comment on the merge request. We have these two tests: - touchscreen/nontouch-automated - detects automatically if a display is NOT touch - touchscreen/multitouch-automated - detects automatically if it is touch The rest of touch tests are based on multitouch-automated (the positive one), except touchscreen/multitouch-manual, the depends on the nontouch one, basically to make sure that the screen is actually non touch (and not a problem with the driver). So the multitouch-manual test should say something like: "Your screen was detected as a non touch screen. Is this correct?" So, if it was actually a touch one we fail the test, and not the other way round. Po-Hsu, can you propose another merge along those lines, please? Thanks! Ara. > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
