On 10-oct-08, at 14:50, Antonio Pérez wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Benjamin Podszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> > > First of all, I'm using cherokee since last days of August, and I'm > trying to learn about it and help with bug reports since then. > > I agree with you about cherokee-admin. One of my first private > messages to Alvaro was about cherokee-admin. I said him that it was > more a stone in my way that a help.
Guys, we are ALL for improving it until we get it to be the outstanding tool that it's meant to be. :-) Please, do not hesitate to speak up and expose your ideas. They will certainly help us to speed up the development. > Now, I think that cherokee-admin is a great idea, but must evolve. > Anyway, I think that config file must be more user friendly too. Most > users of cherokee are sysadmins, so they use "vi" without problems... > :) IMHO that's more a bug than a feature, you know. As far as cherokee-admin allows to configure every little piece of the server, there should not be a single reason to go back to the 60s and start modifying a configuration text file. Cherokee-admin aims to make people's life easier. Quick frankly, even if it isn't still perfect, I think it eases the web server administration process for most of the users. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
