On 27-oct-08, at 14:41, leonel wrote: > Gunnar Wolf wrote: >> leonel dijo [Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:28:58PM -0600]: >> >>> I've checked the ubuntu bugs and closed 2 but 1 is still open >>> but this needs a change in packagin >>> >>> Gunnar , Alvaro : >>> >>> Can we do this : >>> >>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cherokee/+bug/245248 >>> >> >> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -l cherokee >> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold >> | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig- >> aWait/Trig-pend >> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: >> uppercase=bad) >> ||/ Name Version Description >> +++-===================-===================- >> ====================================================== >> ii cherokee 0.9.4-1 extremely fast and >> flexible web server >> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -L cherokee| grep cherokee-admin >> /usr/sbin/cherokee-admin >> /usr/share/doc/cherokee/bundle_cherokee-admin.html >> /usr/share/man/man1/cherokee-admin.1.gz >> >> So, I fail to see the bug :) > > I guess he is asking for a .deb that only contains the admin module > That's why I asked if we can do it
That would make sense as well. At the end of the day, cherokee and cherokee-admin do not depend on each other from a technical point of view. However, I bet it'd be an issue for many people who would install Cherokee without checking the suggested/recommended packages. That's the reason why I'd personally keep them together. In my understanding, it will help the average user to have a much better experience while installing and configuring Cherokee on Debian. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
