On 30-oct-08, at 10:13, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> On 29-oct-08, at 11:42, Pascal Varet wrote:
>
>> Firstly, is there or will there be a way to activate keepalives per
>> virtual host, as opposed to the whole server? Keepalives speed up the
>> serving of static content but murder the performance of dynamic
>> applications, so under Lighttpd I have a virthost with keepalives for
>> static contents and a virthost without keepalive for Django proper.  
>> As
>> a rule of thumb, different server parameters for different virtual
>> hosts would be extremely useful for all sorts non-trivial setups, but
>> it's really the keepalives that will make or break the deal for me.
>
> That's a good point, actually.  I have just logged it as a RFE:
>
>  http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/detail?id=181
>
> Most probably it will be implemented in Cherokee 0.11.


It has already landed in trunk (r2264)..

Pascal, thanks for the feedback!

--
Octality
http://www.octality.com/

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to