On Dec 17, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 17-dic-08, at 13:40, Miguel Angel wrote: >> 2008/12/17 Tim Post <[email protected]> >> I define 'crap' as a page that just regurgitates some RSS feed while >> plastering it with ads. Now we get into adult sites, what about >> those? >> Making the link say [ADULTS ONLY] seems good to me and demonstrates >> why >> human review is needed. >> >> I agree that human revision would be totally needed in the case of >> real links. >> And that's a problem, because the project needs a lot of workforce >> in many >> other parts that probably are more important that links. > > We need to protect it against spam. That's all. I don't think we > should even try to judge domains content. Actually, I don't mind > whether it's a blog, an ads server, porn, or anything else, as long as > it runs Cherokee. > > IMO, we ought to do something as plain as simple as: If your domain > uses Cherokee you are very welcome to add it to our fancy "Proud > Cherokee Users" list. Depending of the content, we'll get a relevance > value that will be used to sort the domain list: The most interesting > domains will much more visible at the the top, the 'crap' will end up > at the bottom. > > At the end of the day, it's buzz. We aren't building a list of > anything worth reviewing by a human, don't you think?
Why not just put a nofollow on the links so it doesn't interfere with anyones pagerank? -- Leonardo Santagada santagada at gmail.com _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
