> If I could copy a block of code across and bung that straight into a > vserver, it would take a tiny amount of time. I imagine it would make > writing recipes a lot simpler too! > > The one technical issue I can see is the config file uses numbers to know > which vserver a rule is for. Perhaps cookbook entries could use "?" instead > and the admin could look for vserver!?! and replace the ? with the correct > number. Or move to YAML/XML/etc where you don't need so much repetition.
What would really improve the situation for the cookbooks is the ability of the admin interface to parse preconfigured config snips, and insert them with appropriate numbering at the right place. Then there would be no manual editing/pasting to the config files, and the simple principle of the admin interface would be kept intact. The functionality could be similar to the extensions in Firefox where you click a link to install. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
