Thanks for the info... Read through the prior conversation thread.
However, didn't see what exactly can be done for users at this point to fix the graphs... at this point, losing the prior data isn't a huge deal to me :) just want things to work again.... What needs deleted to get things back to normal? On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello there, > > On 27/11/2009, at 03:51, pub crawler wrote: > >> Not sure if this new or if I missed a conversation on the list. >> Installed latest trunk from source. >> >> Immediately our graphs in Cherokee started showing this tiny >> inaccurate counts. From the point where we restarted with the newest >> version onward the graph falls almost to 0. Something is wrong. It's >> a holiday here in the US, but our traffic isn't that low :) >> >> Any ideas? > > Yeah. We discussed it on the cherokee-dev mailing list: > > http://lists.octality.com/pipermail/cherokee-dev/2009-November/003711.html > > Basically, Cherokee 0.99.30 will support an improved 'Connections graph' > where HTTP requests are also drawn. That gives you a much better figure of > the real load of the servers and the ratio between TCP connections and HTTP > requests (which would be the keep-alive ratio, actually). > > The downside; you'll have to delete the server.rrd file an let Cherokee > recreate it with the new format. It needs the database to hold a new value, > and as you could expect, this sort of specialized DB engines are not flexible > enough to allow new 'column' additions on a table. > > The discussion on the -dev mailing list was about whether or not we should > write some sort of converter for the server.rrd file. That'd be some sort of > script for exporting all the data to XML, then process it (add the new field) > and then reimport the XML file. Personally, I'm not against the idea, > although I do not think it's worth so much effort. > > I did delete the files on a couple of servers. After a couple of hours the > graphs began to be useful again, so I don't think it's such a big deal. > Anyway, discussion on the topic very is welcome, as always.. :-) > > -- > Octality > http://www.octality.com/ > > _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
