For me the option Alvaro idea is OK, but the consistency as Diego says is important too... so maybe it's even better to remove the cpu count and just leave the cores count ? ( exactly as Diego says ) And there is still 3rd option "2,4 GHz, UNK Logical Processors, 2 Cores" which is bad for me...
Greetings, Jędrzej Nowak On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/01/2011, at 21:51, Diego Schulz wrote: > >> But there's still a problem that needs to be solved, and IMHO the most easy >> way is just >> to provide the number of available virtual CPUs (just drop the physical CPU >> count), >> in all supported platforms (for consistency). > > On a second though, maybe we could just skip the number of physical > processors from the string in the case the OS could not provide it, so the > widget would read "2,4 GHz, 2 Cores" instead of "2,4 GHz, 1 Logical > Processors, 2 Cores". > > -- > Octality > http://www.octality.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee-announce mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee-announce > _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
