I'm guessing any form of vps setup's would have issues with benchmarking.. I was hardly going to run this on my home connection or pay for a uber dedi. I'm not trying to play favourites, I'm just comparing the difference between the 2 web servers running on my vps, and its pretty obvious looking a long/short-term graphs, using the "oh you're on a openvz/vps, therefore this doesn't count" card doesn't hold.
The graphs don't deviate much. The node isn't under any great load, and it would show in the graphs (I could post longer 2-3-4 days but they're pretty much the same). 2011/5/25 Tony Zakula <[email protected]>: >> Both web servers packages are compiled on ubuntu 11.04/openvz hosting. > > Using openvz hosting? That is not even a real test. There are so > many variables, tweaks and adjustments when using OpenVZ that you > could not possibly count on that bench mark even if you controlled the > server. If you are using a hosting providers server, it makes it even > more nebulous because they will be using their own controls. The > memory and processing units are not even for real memory. With > OpenVZ you can tweak those at will. > > The only way to get real benchmarks is on a real machine. > > Tony > > > 2011/5/24 Jędrzej Nowak <[email protected]>: >> Hmm >> >> You can easy compress things in cherokee too. Just enable it in >> cherokee-admin ;-) >> For "gzip static" like behaviour you need to enable flcache (with >> PURGE support for your config). >> >> IOCache in cherokee is caching only plain files when you don't use >> gzip... That's why. >> >> Greetings, >> Jędrzej Nowak >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Ryan B <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This is static content (only http, and no php enabled), also using >>> gzip-static.in nginx (cache-io doesn't quite cut it in cherokee) >>> >>> I found the cache too aggressive in cherokee, if I upload a newer file >>> I'd still keep serving the the cached file for a while (I wasn't >>> actually sure when it actually expired).. so I manually lowered the >>> expiry time for the cache (900secs), performance dives :/ >>> >>> Okay a quick break down of the stats.. >>> >>> Nginx-generated traffic is cut in half (thanks to gzip-static) vs Cherokee >>> Nginx: 118Mb Ram, Cherokee: 260Mb >>> CPU: nginx is by-far using less, that race isn't even close. >>> >>> A break down, http://i.imgur.com/JVO1w.png >>> >>> Both web servers packages are compiled on ubuntu 11.04/openvz hosting. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cherokee mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cherokee mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >> > _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
