Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List ------------------------------------------------------------
I think I replied to this already, but here goes again I've got no where particular to go... The guy is wearing a winter coat and wool hat. It was in the 70's at 9AM The view faces North or uptown. The plane came from the south. The plane hit at a 45 degree angle. The plane in the photo was flying level. The observation deck in the other tower doesn't open until 9:30 so no one could have been up on it. And that tower isn't the one with the observation deck That one had windows on the world and the observation deck is all enclosed.......... Finally, I was down there again on Tuesday and it occured to me that if 220 floors glass fell into the streets of NY you'd think that maybe there might be a piece of it somewhere. There isn't. Not a splinter. It was all pulverized. Its all steel and very fine dust. A roll of film wasn't going to make it out of the rubble, survive the fall and the fire. Enough already! Anybody remember Frank Frazetta's fantasy are. It looks like one of his backgrounds. Paul G. Ferguson Attorney At Law 185-01 Union Turnpike Fresh Meadows, NY 11366 (718) 454-1800 Fax 454-1876 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.NewYorkLawyer.com "Work like you don't need the money, Love like you've never been hurt and Dance like no one is watching." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luis Heberto Corbala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Fwd: FW: WTC Picture Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List ------------------------------------------------------------ Not only that, but the shutter speed needed to freeze a flying jet is very high. Yes, I know that cameras either digital or regular ones can deliver these speeds but how many tourists do you know of that will set their speed that high and therefore open the lens for the proper ratio for a simple tourist picture? I am not saying it can't be done, but that gives me yet another reason to question the photo's authenticity... Luis H. Corbal� Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico >Yes Rich the picture is a phony and here's the bluntly obvious reason why. >How in the world would have the film been developed???? I think that guy and >his camera wouldn't have survived. > >Tom ----------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
