I just checked out the Sanderson web site. I see their full length BBC headers, model number C7 fits Chevelles 67 & up. Can anybody tell me why it wont fit a 66 Chevelle?

Larry Shouse

----- Original Message ----- From: "Clint Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <Chevelle-list@chevelles.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] 67 small block headers


I don't know if Sanderson sells to distributors. Here's their
website,though. http://www.sandersonheaders.com/index.htm
Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
----- Original Message ----- From: "mike f" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Who sells the Sanderson product?

--- Clint Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Kelly,there are many different brands of headers
> that will fit your 65. Brad and I were talking about
> headers for a lowered car. If your 65 is going to be
> low,the Sandersons are the way to go.
> Clint Hooper
> H&H Custom,owner
> 1969 El Camino ProTourer
> 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
>
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>   I have a 65 Small Block and want to add headers.
> Also have a Muncie, M-21, 4 speed manual
> transmission.   So what headers do some of you
> recommend?
>
>   Thank you,
>   Kelly
>
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Clint Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I like both of them too,Brad,but if you're running a
> manual trans they won't
> work. If you aren't,the Hedman & Patriots are a
> little cheaper.
> Clint Hooper
> H&H Custom,owner
> 1969 El Camino ProTourer
> 2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
>
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brad Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > I have Hedman mid-length headers, and I think
> there are a few other brands
> > (Patriot?) that have them.  They are still not
> full length tuned headers,
> > but they are a bit better than block hugger or
> shorty headers.  I had to
> > swap to the mid length headers because the Hooker
> long tubes kept
> bottoming
> > out as they were the lowest part of my car!
> >
> > Brad Waller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
> > '66 Corvette | 327/dead | 4-speed   | Wilwood
> Brakes | 245/45/16 BFG R1
> > '67 Chevelle | ex-SS396 | 355/700R4 | F-Body
> Brakes  | 275/40/17 Kumho MX
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of mike f
> > > Subject: [Chevelle-list] 67 small block headers
> > >
> > > I am going to set the old nasty headers back in
> to see
> > > how clearance they had as compared to the new
> > > Flowtech's on my 67. It's a 383 motor with big
> valve
> > > World Products S/R torker heads. What shorty and
> > > standard headers do you suggest?
> > >
> > > mike
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com







Reply via email to