I have 4.10 gears with a turbo 350 transmission and 28" tall tires.  I run about 3,500 at 65MPH with a small block.  I don't like it but chose this gear ratio knowing I was going to swap in a 4L60E trans giving me a cruise rpm of about 2,600 at 65MPH.  A taller tire will only help.  3.73 is still a fairly steep gear and I agree with John would be considered marginal with a 1:1 final drive ration trans such as the TH350/400.  If you ever plan on swapping in an overdrive trans it would be worth the short term discomfort of high rpm cruising.  It's more difficult to change gear ratio than trans in my opinion.  I set up my own diff and it's a job by yourself in your garage on your back.  Hope this helps.  I would stick with 2,500 rpm as a target cruise rpm.
 
Joe LaRovere
1971 Chevelle SS soon to be LS1 powered.
Mesa Arizona


From: Clint Hooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 8:59 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Ring and Pinion

Just because I wouldn't want 3.73's without an overdrive trans doesn't mean you won't,Ryan. It's only money.
Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
----- Original Message -----

I know that gear ratio has been a topic a lot lately but I am going to purchase my new set this week.  I noticed that some people are running 3:73's and was wondering how they liked them as an all around gear.  I noticed that Clint had mentioned that 3:73's were a marginal gear for the highway.  I guess what I was wondering was would a numerically lower gear set be a better route for a cruizer?  I would still like a little snap at times but I also dont want to be running 4500rpm down the highway.  I know there are formulas out there but was wanting personal opinions from people that have cruizers.  Let me know what you think. 
Glad I bought a bunch of parts this week becuase it is snowing right now and I can hide in the garage!
 
Ryan

Reply via email to