Thank you David.
Websockets work well with Firefox 25.0, they do not in Chrome Version 
33.0.1750.146. I am getting 'connection closed' on the server side and it 
looks like the browser is failing to do ssl handshake with the server. I am 
running:

{cb_admin,"Chicago Boss Admin Interface",
           "/bin/sh: 1: 0.7.1: not found"},
 {hub,"My Awesome Web Framework",
      "/bin/sh: 1: 0.0.1: not found"},
 {boss,"Chicago Boss web framework, now serving three flavors of Comet",
       "0.8.11"},
 {cowboy,"Small, fast, modular HTTP server.","0.9.0"},
 {ranch,"Socket acceptor pool for TCP protocols.","0.9.0"},
 {cowlib,"Support library for manipulating Web protocols.",
         "0.4.0"},
 {tinymq,"TinyMQ: a diminutive message queue","0.1.0"},
 {mimetypes,"mimetypes","1.0"},
 {crypto,"CRYPTO version 2","3.2"},
 {lager,"Erlang logging framework","2.0.3"},
 {goldrush,"Erlang event stream processor","0.1.6"},
 {compiler,"ERTS  CXC 138 10","4.9.4"},
 {syntax_tools,"Syntax tools","1.6.13"},
 {sasl,"SASL  CXC 138 11","2.3.4"},
 {stdlib,"ERTS  CXC 138 10","1.19.4"},
 {kernel,"ERTS  CXC 138 10","2.16.4"}


Any work-arounds?



On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 09:15:05 UTC+1, David Welton wrote:
>
> Hi, 
>
> > Guys, I have downloaded the draw tutorial and this is just not 
> kicking... 
> > The connection to my websockets handler gets immediately closed. Any 
> ideas? 
> > 
> > I have played around a bit with Zotonic and I have to admit the support 
> for 
> > websockets there is just so much better, there is automatic fallback to 
> > comet and it just works. They have their own java script libraries for 
> this 
> > whereas CB simply lacks this basic stuff. Making the use of websockets 
> > useless in production... 
> > 
> > Any plans to improve websockets handling in the nearest future? 
>
> Chicago Boss is in something of a transition period, so it's kind of 
> rough around the edges right now.  But the web socket stuff does work, 
> or at least it did in the past.  We were successfully using it. 
>
> CB is a lot smaller than Zotonic (check out the difference in memory 
> footprints), so it's more of a system where you'll need to bring a few 
> of your own libraries and build the application you want, rather than 
> getting a ton of stuff out of the box. 
>
> -- 
> David N. Welton 
>
> http://www.welton.it/davidw/ 
>
> http://www.dedasys.com/ 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ChicagoBoss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/797363f5-7c0c-444f-81cf-92cfddf1fe6a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to