Hi, first of all, if your app requires 500 req/s or even more, it's better to check on your specific use case and run some tests with both solutions, before making any decision. Usually, bottle-neck is at DB access and not at routing or simple calculations. So ability to serve 15k can be only theoretic, if your database can serve something like 300 req/s at it's best.
And, yep, CB probably not the fastest one. On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Evgeny M <[email protected]> wrote: > Routing in CB is/was slow > > суббота, 1 ноября 2014 г., 19:39:03 UTC+3 пользователь Caiyun Deng написал: >> >> Hi! >> I saw the n2o's introduction, https://github.com/5HT/n2o >> The comparision of performance said that: ChicagoBoss has only >> 500 req/s, and n2o is 15K req/s. >> It is hard to believe that. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ChicagoBoss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/3e63484d-08eb-4e3b-bff1-f3a94bca0a0f%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/3e63484d-08eb-4e3b-bff1-f3a94bca0a0f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChicagoBoss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/CAF9GSxYg6rGhvXQKc8TN0LjBMCuvJuo50Fd7J087hBoTwB1%2Bwg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
