Christian Kellermann <ck...@pestilenz.org> writes: > I have amended your test's commit message and comment to reflect > the correct commit hashes (I hope). Other than that these are fine > and I've pushed them.
Thanks a bunch! I have another small patch which renames the regression test module to be slightly more descriptive. I already have the need for yet another hygiene regression test so I guess it makes sense to properly name those modules :-) Moritz
>From 12aa01799de4baa6dae5ef223a9783b1f85e7889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Moritz Heidkamp <mor...@twoticketsplease.de> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:36:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] give the #805 regression test module a more descriptive name --- tests/syntax-tests.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/syntax-tests.scm b/tests/syntax-tests.scm index 82a3850..c1a2fa8 100644 --- a/tests/syntax-tests.scm +++ b/tests/syntax-tests.scm @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ take ;; #805: case-lambda is unhygienic (as well as ensure, see 4706afb4 and bc5cc698) -(module foo () +(module case-lambda-and-ensure-hygiene () (import (prefix chicken c/) (prefix scheme s/)) (c/case-lambda ((a) a)) (c/ensure s/even? 2)) -- 1.7.9.4
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers