Christian Kellermann <ck...@pestilenz.org> writes:
> I have amended your test's commit message and comment to reflect
> the correct commit hashes (I hope). Other than that these are fine
> and I've pushed them.

Thanks a bunch! I have another small patch which renames the regression
test module to be slightly more descriptive. I already have the need for
yet another hygiene regression test so I guess it makes sense to
properly name those modules :-)

Moritz
>From 12aa01799de4baa6dae5ef223a9783b1f85e7889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Moritz Heidkamp <mor...@twoticketsplease.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:36:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] give the #805 regression test module a more descriptive name

---
 tests/syntax-tests.scm |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/syntax-tests.scm b/tests/syntax-tests.scm
index 82a3850..c1a2fa8 100644
--- a/tests/syntax-tests.scm
+++ b/tests/syntax-tests.scm
@@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ take
 
 
 ;; #805: case-lambda is unhygienic (as well as ensure, see 4706afb4 and bc5cc698)
-(module foo ()
+(module case-lambda-and-ensure-hygiene ()
   (import (prefix chicken c/) (prefix scheme s/))
   (c/case-lambda ((a) a))
   (c/ensure s/even? 2))
-- 
1.7.9.4

_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers

Reply via email to