>Thanks for reporting that. It's probably the same case as >http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/917
Well, no. The clang warnings are not the problem. I think it's this scrutinizer test that's failing: --- scrutiny.expected 2012-08-30 22:00:02.000000000 -0700 +++ scrutiny.out 2012-09-09 15:05:22.000000000 -0700 @@ -97,3 +97,17 @@ (scrutiny-tests.scm:136) in procedure call to `+', expected argument #2 of type `number', but was given an argument of type `symbol' Warning: redefinition of standard binding: car \ No newline at end of file Derrell _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
