* felix winkelmann <fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org> [130203 01:03]: > From: Christian Kellermann <ck...@pestilenz.org> > Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Apply the same naming scheme for .so libs > in "libs" target > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:08:34 +0100 > > > Hi all, > > > > As I went through the instruction for cross-compilation in the > > manual I read about the "libs" target. It seems to me that it creates > > the so lib and its symbolic link the opposite way as install-libs > > does. Which results in a broken link when you call install-libs > > later on. I also think that the way install-lib does it is better > > than the "libs" way. I write better because there is still a minor > > number missing in our .so files but that's another story... > > > > So if you are still with me I would be honored if you find some > > time to give this some thought. I think the cross compilation process > > is broken without the patch. I have tested this for mipsel and arm > > cross compilation. So far I cannot say that its all working for me, > > I am still sorting out the leftover debris, but this looks broken > > hence the patch. Maybe I got it all wrong... > > I'm not sure about this. I know that the current behaviour is not > fully correct, but I repeatedly had problems the other way round, I > think mostly in the situation when I ran freshly built binaries in the > current build-directory, without installation (this may sound > peculiar, but I need this for testing).
Are you runnning make libs install-dev then? I always wondered what the usage of these targets is... The patch should not affect the "usual" make targets at all. At least as I read it atm... -- In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can surpass it. --- Lao Tzu _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers