On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote: > > You somehow missed C_i_memv, though, which resulted in library-tests > > to fail. So at least the tests are complete :) > > Hm, that's weird, I was sure I had given it a final run. Anyway, I might > be missing something but my patch actually does cover C_i_memv (lines > 73-82), doesn't it? AFAICT you added another check to C_u_i_memq, > referring to memv in the error message. But isn't the point of C_u_* > variants to be unchecked?
I don't know, I seem to be losing my mind or something :) > Note that I made a bootstrap build before running the tests. Maybe > that's why the tests didn't fail for me? I did a full rebuild using the new CHICKEN. The test failed because it did not receive an error so that's unlikely to be due to old code. Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
