On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:05:48AM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Peter Bex scripsit: > > > Yes, that's fine. I'm tired of arguing about this, and I know I can't > > win. I prefer getting the patch in over arguing about it, and nobody > > else seems to have an opinion about this. > > I do, actually.
Sorry, too late. > The trouble with this code is that it copies a byte > at a time, and so may be much less efficient than existing library > versions What, like the original code from OpenBSD libc that Christian posted, and which also works a byte at a time? > which do it smart, a 32-bit or 64-bit word at a time with > adjustments. I would like to see some measurements on at least > a few platforms before we install this vanilla code. Patches are welcome. Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
