On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:50:57PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote: > Here's a very simple patch for #1085. > > As a side note, there are lots of other procedures in srfi-1.scm without > argument type checks. Are the cases where they're not there intentional, > or would it be worth looking into adding some, where sensible? > > Either way, I think these lset procedures should have guards added since > the results can be quite confusing otherwise.
Thanks, I've finally had a chance to look at it and pushed this to master as well as chicken-5. Cheers, Peter -- http://www.more-magic.net _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
