On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Peter Bex <peter....@xs4all.nl> wrote: > How so? It's the correct Schemely way of handling strings, to disallow > embedded NUL bytes.
What I was eluding to is that it seems to me that Chicken is the Scheme that can generally be expected to make design choices which favour accommodating inter-operation with C. > Making debugging easier with CHICKEN is an open project that nobody has > picked up so far. The pony page has a "source level debugger" bullet > point. It looks pretty innocuous there, but it would be a large project > that takes a significant amount of work and requires quite a familiarity > with core (which one could work up while working on the project, of course). It seems to me the lowest-hanging fruit here would be to finish the SLDB support in the SLIME egg; which, from a brief poke around earlier today, looks like it may require some core-level hand-waving. Definitely something I'll think about. -Dan _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
