On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 08:07:39PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote: > Hi! > > I noticed that Evan is heavily working on "modularizing" the core > units in the chicken-5 branch. Before our branches diverge too much, > we should consider whether the "drop-srfi-1" branch should be merged. > > I have added an "unused" declaration to mini-srfi-1.scm, but did not > rename the primitives defined there, it appeared too ugly to me. I can > still do that, if you think this is better (a suggestion in what way > these operations should ne named would be appreciated in that case). > > Peter mentioned that a squash-commit would be undesirable, so how > should this be handled, in case the change should be added?
Since nobody else has replied to this, can you explain exactly what's going on? You added a (declare (unused ...)), IIUC, but I don't see why or how this will cause trouble with a merge. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers