On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:30:29PM -0400, co...@ccil.org wrote: > Peter Bex scripsit: > > > Here's a patch to restore allowance of zero or single argument calls > > of numeric comparator procedures in CHICKEN 5. It's a little ugly, > > as these kind of exceptions generally are, so any cleanups are welcome. > > I'm not disagreeing with this patch, but would it be just as easy to > rewrite these calls as just #t?
That's what's already happening in types.db so the compiler will already do that, but in evaluated code or cases like (apply + (read)) it will directly call this C function and it needs to manually check the argument count. That's the inconsistency I mentioned in my earlier message. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
