On 2015-10-04 14:55, Peter Bex wrote: > Cool. Have you been able to reproduce the crash (without patch) at all?
Yeah, by simply running `make check` in a loop until it fails. It doesn't usually take more than 10 or 12 runs to hit the error (and only one or two when inside a VM). > > Just two minor things: (1) it looks like one too many words is allocated > > for the C_apply_values argvector > > The argvector holds the continuation followed by each item in the > argument list, which is why I added 1 to it. Yes, but that +1 is already done once before the C_demand (line 7304 after applying the first patch), then done again in the argument to C_alloc (line 7309). I think only the first one is necessary; that way we'll be C_alloc'ing the same amount that's C_demand'ed, and that's used for the eventual C_do_apply call, (+ (length lst) 1). Evan _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
