On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Peter Bex <pe...@more-magic.net> wrote:
I can imagine those macros going into (chicken base) and/or some > other modules, but a (chicken syntax) module with them in it makes > sense too. Then we could just rename (chicken syntax) on the > c-l-r page to (chicken expand) and keep expand.scm as-is. > That sounds right to me. The R7RS Yellow Edition (next after the current Orange Edition) will focus on syntax, and I plan to propose that all the macros added to the large language be put in a single (scheme syntax) library, possibly including SRFIs 2, 8, 17, 26, 31 .... Keeping the macro expansion machinery in (chicken expand) makes sense to me as well. -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org Nobody expects the RESTifarian Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise ... surprise and tedium ... tedium and surprise .... Our two weapons are tedium and surprise ... and ruthless disregard for unpleasant facts.... Our three weapons are tedium, surprise, and ruthless disregard ... and an almost fanatical devotion to Roy Fielding....
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
