On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:04:48AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote: > On 2018-01-28 13:55, Peter Bex wrote: > > One suggestion: Given that input-port-open? and output-port-open? are > > in chicken.base, I would find it more intuitive to have port-closed? in > > chicken.base as well. What do you think? > > Sounds good. Here's an updated patch.
I've tested it, and had to put back some (import chicken) clauses because the CHICKEN I used for bootstrapping (current master) did not yet have the chicken.base import library which contains these procedures. Thus, I put back (import chicken) and added the string port procedures to chicken.import.scm again. We can take those out once we make a new prerelease for bootstrapping (which should happen soonish). Other than that, great work, thanks! Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
