On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:32:52PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote: > On 2018-08-24 9:27, Peter Bex wrote: > > I'd prefer to add the current module to struct type declarations, instead. > > This should be equally simple; I think we can add this to validate-type's > > handling of struct: if the struct is not qualified, add the current > > module (if any). > > That approach has the problem megane described on the ticket. When it's > used, we don't have enough info to disambiguate one struct type from > another, unless you expect users to include a module prefix manually in > all cases. I think that's too big a change for 5.0.
OK, I see what you're saying. I think you're right; this is the correct approach in the meantime and should be (mostly) backwards-compatible once we figure out a good way to import and rename/prefix types from modules. Cheers, Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
