> Of course. In fact, I think it would make more sense to simply tell the > runtime options parser to stop after the first non-"-:"-prefixed > argument. That makes runtime argument stuffing harder and allows it > to play nice with _any_ option parser, and makes the "--" behaviour > automatically work if the program already handles getopt-style options.
That's another idea. Backwards compatibility is from now on fucked anyway, so let's try to find somethin simple and sensible. felix
