On 9/26/05, Alex Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:38:50 +0000, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > > > > I'm confused about the behavior of hash tables in compiled code. > > > > $ cat ht.scm > > (let ((ht (make-hash-table string=?))) > > (hash-table-set! ht "a" "b") > > (print (hash-table-ref ht "a"))) > > [...] > > > #;1> (use ht) > > ; loading ./ht.so ... > > #f > > The default hash procedure doesn't seem to handle literal strings > correctly. If you were to use non-literals it would work: >
Here a patch for extras.scm: 1493d1492 < ((##sys#permanent? x) (##core#inline "C_hashptr" x)) cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
