On 11/21/05, Pupeno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You only need to handle compiler-specifiic syntax, which is mainly > > #> ... <#- > Why ? I already handle that and I already encountered cases where I'd have to > handle <<EOF and similar.
The standard reader should handle #<<... by default. > > BTW, what should I return from my procedures that handle extensions. I was > returning '() but that causes an error, I am now returning '(nevermind) since > I don't care about it. Sorry, what kind of procedures are that? cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
