On 4/19/06, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hm, I wonder why string-substitute and string-substitute* > look so different; one uses an internal concatenate the other > uses ##sys#fragments->string.
I have already cleaned this up a little (see darcs head). > The other note I found: even if I put only one pair in smap, > the time string-substitute* took is double the time > string-substitute took. > The count string-search-positions that I counted > was also twice with string-substitute*. > > Does this help anyting? Yes, the old code was simply suboptimal. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
