On 8/3/06, Daishi Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now, I can reproduce the problem.% cat dump.scm (use s11n) (define x (make-hash-table)) (hash-table-set! x 'aaa (make-hash-table)) (hash-table-set! x 'bbb (make-hash-table)) (with-output-to-file "dump" (lambda () (serialize x))) % cat undump.scm (use s11n) (define (deserialize-fallback id) (cond ((string=? id "f_3497library.scm") ; chicken-2.315 equal?) ((string=? id "f_6914extras.scm") ; chicken-2.315 hash) (else (error "deserialize-fallback unknown id" id)))) (with-input-from-file "dump" (lambda () (deserialize (current-input-port) deserialize-fallback))) % /usr/local/chicken-2.315/bin/csi -q -s dump.scm % /usr/local/chicken-2.41/bin/csi -q -s undump.scm Error: (for-each) argument is not a proper list: ((aaa . #<hash-table>) . #<procedure (hash x1094 . g10931095)>) Call history: <eval> (##sys#require (quote s11n)) <eval> (with-input-from-file "dump" (lambda () (deserialize (current-input-port) deserialize-fallback))) <eval> (deserialize (current-input-port) deserialize-fallback) <eval> (current-input-port) <eval> [deserialize-fallback] (string=? id "f_3497library.scm") <eval> [deserialize-fallback] (string=? id "f_3497library.scm") <eval> [deserialize-fallback] (string=? id "f_6914extras.scm")<--
I can't say much about this problem. As I already said, the procedure-IDs might be re-used, so this approach is definitely not safe. cheers, felix -- http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
