Matthew Welland wrote:
I'd suggest going one step further and striving to keep the scheme portion not too chicken specific. Other schemes would only have to provide the interface layer and the bulk of the code could be reused.
From a support and community growth standpoint, I see no value in projects that try to be all things to all Schemes. Doing things well on Chicken is what's important. Also, reuse doesn't mean anything without people and interest.
Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
